Transcripts from the public meeting May 2002
Background
Background
| Facilities | Information
| Footpaths | Publicity
| Working together | Conclusions
This group was formed in February 2001, as a community response
to the Foot and Mouth Crisis. The group comprises over 30 members
from different areas of the Outdoor Interest Sector, and became
a constituted association in the summer of 2001.
The membership concluded that one of the most positive things to
emerge from the Foot and Mouth Crisis was the active participation
in negotiations to enable ‘responsible access’ during
this time. This demonstrated that co-operation, lobbying and communication
between users of the outdoors, businesses dependent on outdoor activity,
land managers and the local authority can lead to the achievement
of significant results.
The membership agreed at their AGM to continue to promote dialogue
in two main ways:
Participation in local and national access issues
- The Scottish Land Reform Bill and Access Code for Scotland
- The Nevis Strategy
Community Consultation
- The identification of projects which could improve the quality
of access in Lochaber
This report focuses on the second of these – the identification
of projects aiming to improve the quality of access in Lochaber
through community consultation.
The group became aware that users of the outdoors in Lochaber had
a number of ideas and suggestions regarding projects which may significantly
improve the quality of access in Lochaber. A meeting was held on
Friday 8th February 2002 with the aim of drawing together the ideas
and issues from various working groups. 35 participants attended
and contributed to this meeting.
The meeting was facilitated by Karen Macinnes and Samantha Reynolds,
of Voluntary Action Lochaber.
Working Groups
Six groups, each with a different focus, compiled a list of issues
and potential projects. Many of these issues were common to all
the groups. A full list of the issues raised by each working group
are detailed in Appendix 1. The working groups were ‘championed’
by members of Lochaber Mountain Access Group who have specific expertise
and interest in that particular area. These champions recorded ideas,
suggestions and issues within the working group and followed this
through leading a discussion on the results within the larger group.
Working groups were as follows:
- Mountaineering - Alan Kimber
- Mountain Biking - Damon Foster
- Skiing - Norman Clark
- Air Sports - Stuart Rodgers
- Paddling - Andy Jackson
- Information & Events - David Wilson
The issues raised by the working groups can broadly be categorised
into 5 main groupings (listed below), which clearly demonstrate
the commonality between the working groups’ priorities. There
is also some overlap between the groupings.
Facilities
Background
| Facilities | Information
| Footpaths | Publicity
| Working together | Conclusions
General
The lack of adequate facilities at present creates problems for
all of the interested parties. However, there was an overall feeling
that there should be freedom of choice – that any payment
should only be for the facilities rather than for access and that
there should be no compulsion to use the facilities. Many practical
solutions were discussed in the full group along with some more
long-term suggestions.
Adequate car parking facilities were felt to be extremely important,
the lack of these is leading to a real fear of potential fatalities
as inappropriate parking and crossing the road in danger spots is
already happening. This was clear at Glencoe Black Corries Jacksonville
Barrier, and also at the layby north of Carr’s Corner. Car
parking should also be available at 3-Mile Water and Spean Bridge,
which should be widely publicised.
Provision of shelters, toilets and changing facilities at car parks
and river sites would be an advantage, as would supplying human
‘pooper-scoopers’ and rubbish-collection bags to stop
the build up of unwelcome waste on the hills. Having rest-stops
on the Pony Track and having a Half-way Lochan Lodge was also felt
to be of benefit. Bothies should be adequate, linked and publicised.
Having adequate public transport, equipped with ski racks and bicycle
racks would encourage more usage. It was particularly felt that
having buses going to Nevis Range in both summer and winter was
important.
Specific
Skiing
- Specified various facilities that could improve this field –
researching snow making; a ‘get-off’ area T-Bar; having
linking runs; being able to move earth/rock to enable top-to-bottom
entry. Some of this would be difficult due to planning restrictions.
Establishing a dry ski run on Aonach Mor and/or Cow Hill would
also be favourable as would installing a ‘moving carpet’
which is an indoor activity and possibly less intimidating for
a first-timer.
Paddling
- In addition to the changing facilities at river sites, identified
potential at Kinlochleven for a large development and also potential
for a big scale development at the Tail Race in Fort William.
Need to create a proper access point at Roy bridge, possibly stairs
from the river to the car park? Floodlighting on some of the rivers.
Air Sports
- Identified provision of a landing area in Nevis Range; Quad
Chair access at Nevis Range; a winch facility; and a light plane
runway. It was noted that formalised access would lead to safe
landing sites – key pad access to the Forestry would allow
use by both visitors, regulars and competitors.
Mountain Biking
- Incorporating a universal grading system would give a clear
indication of abilities needed for mountain bike routes and thus
encourage more usage.
Information and Events
- Provision of an Outdoor Access Information Centre within Fort
William would meet a number of needs. Also an access problem hot-line
is vital.
Information
Background
| Facilities | Information
| Footpaths | Publicity
| Working together | Conclusions
General
There was felt to be a general lack of any co-ordination of information,
which could deter many people from venturing into the ‘great
outdoors’, or from visiting Lochaber in the first place. This
links closely with the category of Publicity and Promotion. There
was broad agreement with the concept of an Outdoor Access Information
Centre. This should be centrally located, within the High Street
ideally, and should be managed by outdoor users. The support and
co-operation of HOST would be actively sought.
Adequate, relevant signage is extremely important. There should
be some signage indicating low level walks and grading of walks;
signs regarding access from Lochybridge need improvement; there
should be a general improvement in road signs.
Guides should be published for lower level walks; local path information
should be published; and a publication specific to access, clarifying
rights of way would be a useful tool.
A co-ordinated sign and leaflet promotional package would be useful,
incorporating a ‘branding’ of Lochaber and the outdoor
activity, including graphics, etc. This could also be transferred
onto a Website promotion.
Information on potential problems and dangers is vital, and there
were several suggestions as to how to combat this:
- Access problem help-line
- Site Boards, with information on dangers
- Phone lines to access data (investigate ISDN for Nevis Range)
While car parks were felt to be a vital facility, it was equally
important that people were aware of the location of car parks. Information
on this should be held within the Tourist Office and grid references
should be contained within guide books.
Specifics
Paddling
- Being able to access information on river flow – currently
there are cost implications for this. River Garry has a scheduled
release of water into the river, although advance notification
of this is not always forthcoming.
Skiing
Air Sports
- Access to real time windspeed data
Footpaths, Routes & Linkages
Background
| Facilities | Information
| Footpaths | Publicity
| Working together | Conclusions
General
Accessibility of walks, and linking walks up into some form of
network was generally felt to be an advantage. A serious concern
was the maintenance of footpaths and routes – who would be
liable for the upkeep and maintenance if these were established?
In a similar vein, there was concern over any liability –
this may be leading to reluctance on landowners’ parts to
upgrade or promote footpaths. This was also an issue if the Lochaber
Mountain Access Group undertook development and maintenance of footpaths
and routes. The Group is to seek further information and advice
on becoming a Trust or a Company Limited by Guarantee, which would
give some protection to the Group members.
Access was a particular issue, specifically access across the golf
course in Fort William which has led to hillwalkers and climbers
having to embark on a longer, more awkward route through Leanachan.
This is not useful when promoting Lochaber as an ‘outdoor
pursuit’ area.
Funding should be targeted towards mountain paths and routes –
many footpaths and routes were specifically identified as in need
of improvement, maintenance, or to be established:
Information & Events identified:
- New path from High School to Leanachan via Glen Nevis
- Network of low-level paths from Fort William town centre
Moutaineering group identified:
- West Highland Way link with Glencoe
- Allt a’Mhuilinn– new direct path from North Face
Car Park
- Toll Road to Allt a’Mhuilinn
- Link from Glen Nevis to Nevis Range
- Poll Dubh – improve mountain paths at Crags
- Improve path on South Side of River Nevis
- Improve wire bridge
Skiing Group identified:
- Access and exit route for Back Corries
Mountain Biking group identified:
- Wades Road
- Bridge over Upper Corrour
- Puggy line to Fersit
- Lundavra to 3-Mile Water
- Single track route to Inchree
- Glen Gloy to Glen Loy
- Single track route to Glen Loy
- Fassifern to Glen Gloy
- Connaglen to Loch Sheil
- Link up major forestry road
- Loch Lochy
- West Highland Way to Ballachulish
- West Highland Way to Inchree
- High Bridge
Air Sports Group identified:
- Access to:- Black Corries Jacksonville
- Glen Gloy
- Melantee
- Leanachan – access for landing hang-gliders
- Ben Duror
- Improvements to Sgur Finisgaig
These routes were endorsed by the main group.
Publicity & Promotion
Background
| Facilities | Information
| Footpaths | Publicity
| Working together | Conclusions
General
There is a real potential to create and publicise an image for
Lochaber as the ‘Outdoor Capital’ of the UK. This will
take effort, but the group are enthusiastic and have a real common
purpose and aim all of which makes this achievable.
Discussion took place around developing a website which is specific
to the outdoor pursuits. Incorporated in this could be webcams from
popular rivers, mountains, the CIC Hut, etc. The ‘branding’
used in leaflets and signage could also be incorporated into the
website. The Flying Group talked of ‘Aonach Mor’s Fame’
within their particular circle – this could be widened. There
are already some record-holding achievements in Lochaber –
hang-gliding record, etc. An aggressive marketing and publicity
campaign should produce positive results. This should be carefully
targeted, using all known links and contacts.
Specific Events
Information & Events
- Mountain Festival Event – this could take place in January/February
- Film Festival – again, this could take place in January/February.
Lochaber could campaign to be a venue in the tour which presently
goes to Banff, Kendal, Llanberis, Dundee, Bretton Hall
- Ice-Climbing Competition – taking place in January/February,
provision could be made at the new Kinlochleven development for
an indoor ice-wall if conditions were not conducive for an outdoor
event or investigated at Nevis Range
Paddling
- World Championship Kayaking Event – work with Alcan for
this
- Extreme kayaking
- Freestyle kayaking
Air Sports
- World Speed Event
- Scottish Open Event could be staged here
- Gliding Competition
Skiing
This is an exciting challenge, and one which could benefit all
sectors in Lochaber, not just those with a direct link to outdoor
pursuits. This is also an area which could engender overall support,
it would put Lochaber firmly on the global map and can only have
positive benefits.
Working together – partnership
Background
| Facilities | Information
| Footpaths | Publicity
| Working together | Conclusions
There were some real issues voiced about the need to work in partnership,
and seek co-operation and support from varying agencies, organisations,
companies and individuals. There is a need to ensure dialogue with
groups such as:
- Community Councils
- Forestry Enterprise
- Scottish National Heritage
- Highland Council
- Lochaber Enterprise
- Nevis Range
- Alcan
- Golf Course
- Scottish Environmental Protection Agency
- HoST
- Other community groups with related aims and objectives
- Landowners
- Transport Forum
- Funders
- John Muir Trust
Conclusions
Background
| Facilities | Information
| Footpaths | Publicity
| Working together | Conclusions
Securing a ‘high street’ presence is vital to enable
the promotion of the outdoors. The establishment of an Outdoor Information
Centre, staffed and resourced by people who have knowledge of and
interest in the outdoors, would be a major asset. An interim measure
may be to investigate some usage of premises within the Tourist
Office, with a longer term goal of either shared premises with the
Tourist Office, or a stand-alone Centre.
Co-ordination of any publicity or promotional campaign could take
place from this Centre. A short-term measure will be to develop
and maintain a Website devoted to the Lochaber Outdoors, incorporating
webcams, general information on the area and facilities available,
and specific information on pathways, routes and events. In addition
to this, a campaign to establish a major event/s for Lochaber in
January or February 2003 should begin soon.
Signage and information leaflets are extremely important –
without adequate, relevant signage uninformed people are not able
to access the footpaths and routes. Establishing an ‘access
problem hot-line’ should also be a priority, as should work
towards ensuring information on river flow, real time windspeed,
etc. is available and accessible.
Progress can be made towards developing the facilities identified
as needed – this may be a combination of working groups progressing
towards specific facilities, such as the Skiing Group looking at
the feasibility of installation of a ‘moving carpet’
and a dry ski run, but the more overarching facilities – car
parks, shelters, toilets and changing facilities, adequate public
transport with ski-racks and bike-racks, etc. – should be
campaigned for by the main group.
Work should be progressed towards establishing new pathways and
routes where necessary; improving existing routes and pathways –
those in need identified by the Group; maintaining existing and
new routes and pathways (listed in Appendix). The Group has to decide
on whether to become a Company Limited by Guarantee, or a Trust,
to enable it to take on the funding, maintenance and liability for
these developments.
There were some major facilities raised as potential developments.
The Group will have to discuss these further and decide on priorities,
who should take these forward, etc.:
Mountaineering
- Rest stop on Pony Track
- Half-way Lochan Lodge
- Bridge at Jacksonville
Skiing
- Get-Off Area T-Bar
- Earth/rock moving to enable top-to-bottom entry
- Linking run
- Snowmaking
- Dry ski run
- Moving Carpet
Paddling
- Big scale development at Tail Race
- Potential at Kinlochleven for large development
- Access to river at Roy Bridge
Air sports
- Key pad access to forestry
- Landing area in Nevis Range
- Quad chair access at Nevis Range
- Winch facility
- Light plane runway
Finally, working in partnership with other agencies, organisations
and individuals is vital to ensure that progress is made towards
these aims. Some dialogue is already present between the Group and
other agencies, this should be strengthened and developed, adding
the other necessary partners.
Background
| Facilities | Information
| Footpaths | Publicity
| Working together | Conclusions
Back to Top
|